Pittsburgh Corporate Attorney Jeremy Garvey Quoted on Anti-Dilution Clause in Wall Street Journal
The article went on to explain that "Ackman protected his investment in Borders by exacting concessions in a $42 million loan deal with the retailer two years ago. In the April 2008 loan commitment, Ackman and Pershing got warrants to buy 14.7 million shares at a $7 strike price, and they included an anti-dilution clause that would give Ackman the right to convert the warrants into 19.99% of outstanding common stock in certain circumstances. … Anti-dilution clauses are common in venture capital deals, especially where savvy investors such as Ackman can negotiate tough terms with companies in need of cash."
Garvey weighed in on the situation noting the fact that Borders agreed to the clause in the loan commitment "speaks to the fact that you had to cut a deal."
Contributors
Related Services & Industries